Here is a question that has been bothering me for quite a while. I am sure it has crossed your mind too but you ignored it.
As you see below around the time that Jesus was walking on earth the population of earth was about 170 million (see below).
So you tell me, walking around Palestine how many people he could possibly reach to enlighten and inform? Let say 1000-2000 people! But what about the rest of the folks.
Chinese, Indians and native Americans etc?! Can we really blame them for being Buddhist and Hindu and “Lord” knows what other religions!
Couldn’t lord have had planned it better to reach every one equally and fairly? Why not bless everyone?
If you look at the table below, had he been showing up a few hundreds year earlier he could have reached a larger proportion of the population and of course by waiting a meager few hundred years by the time of the advent of technology he could have reached everyone. Not to mention the age of Internet and satellite communication!!
So while all this discussion about intelligent design is raging all over I can not help but to think what was so intelligent about showing up too early ?!
Not to mention having an educated audience as opposed to bunch of illiterate shepherds would have helped? Or would it?!!
Here is population of earth vs time (From Wikipedia):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Population_curve.svg
year world population (millions)-10000 4-8000 5-7000 5-6000 5-5000 5-4000 7-3000 14-2000 27-1000 50-750 60-500 100-400 160-200 1500 170 -----> Population on Jesus's first visit200 190400 190500 190600 200700 210800 220900 2261000 3101100 3011200 3601250 4001300 3601340 4431400 3501500 4251600 5451650 4701700 6001750 7901800 9801815 10001850 12601900 16501910 17501920 18601927 20001930 20701940 23001950 24001960 30201970 37001974 40001980 44302005 6500 (December 19th)2007 6576
When playing Roulette there seems to be two competing, contradictory notions at work the same time. One says: The wheel does not have a memory so it does not keep track of the previous numbers and probability of each number coming is the same as any other regardless if it came previous round or how many times in past 20 rounds. On the other hand we know that there is a law in probability, called law of large numbers that miantains that the average value of many trials/outcomes has to approach the expected value of the distribution. In case of roullete the expected value is something around 18. So basically it says you can not have high numbers forever. In other words if you have had lets say 12 high numbers it’s inevitable that smaller numbers start to come. So can be said about red and black outcomes. So which one is it? No memory or memory.I have seen answers to this all over but I am not convienced yet!!